Pineda v. State

probation, see NRS 176A.100(1)(c); NRS 193.140; NRS 199.480(3)(a); Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

P C054,,,A

Parraguirre cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge

Humboldt County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

Humboldt County Clerk

1 Pineda's fast track statement does not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have margins of at least one inch on all four sides. We caution appellant's counsel, Matt Stermitz, that future failure to comply with the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

W.7.=aketrAWM