Mendoza (Andres) v. State

compliance with the procedural requirements set forth in NRS chapter 34. See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). Even assuming that appellant's use of the wrong vehicle could be overlooked, appellant's claim for additional presentence credit lacked merit because the time spent incarcerated after the sentencing hearing but before entry of the judgment of conviction is already credited as flat time against the sentence as the prison begins to calculate a sentence from the sentencing date. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

L°71 J. Hardesty

P e..4.0k Parraguirre J.

J.

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge

Andres Hernandez Mendoza

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) I947A

- -• .7 - I,7-7• 7; 11