MacHado (William) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

MacHado (William) v. State

Opinion

the Blockburger test, appellant's convictions each require proof of an element the other does not. NRS 201.210(1) (requiring an act of lewdness); NRS 201.220(1) (requiring an indecent or obscene exposure). Accordingly, appellant's convictions are not redundant, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. —

J. Hardesty

PCP.4.0k Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2 (0) 1947A a • =.

WNSi4eatiMMINE

Reference

Status
Unpublished