Bell (Eddie) v. State

suffer prejudice from the delay. Hart v. State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. 3 Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4

Aed-A J. Hardesty pc

Parraguirre J.

J.

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge

Eddie Bell

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

...continued

2007); Bell v. State, Docket No. 59158 (Order of Affirmance, March 7, 2012).

3 Weconclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel.

4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A