Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Lee (Jeffrey) v. Warden

Lee (Jeffrey) v. Warden
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 14, 2013
Lee (Jeffrey) v. Warden

Opinion

Appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of due process because he received: (1) advance written notice of the charges; (2) written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for disciplinary action; and (3) a qualified right to call witnesses and present evidence. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-69 (1974). Some evidence supported the decision by the prison disciplinary hearing officer, Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985), and therefore, appellant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

-- D.z7t1 111-N Dougl -

Saitta cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge

Jeffrey Lee

Attorney General/Carson City

Attorney General/Las Vegas

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

...continued which imposes an atypical and signification hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life).

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.