Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Poelmans v. Kerseboom

Poelmans v. Kerseboom
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 10, 2013
Poelmans v. Kerseboom

Opinion

p An unpub|isheld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. SuPREME Coum‘

OF

NEvAoA

CLERK’S ORDER (O)-l947 ~'@

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHIEL POELMANS, No. 63426

Appellant,

BARBARA KERsEBooM AND oLARK ooUNTY DEPARTMENT oF FAMILY ]UL m mg sERvIcEs, * o o.

R€Spondents_ TRAC\E K. L\NDEMAN

D‘EPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed in this court on June 20, 2013, without payment of the requisite filing fee.l On July 8, 2013, appellant filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal dislnissed. lt is so ORDERED.

CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

BY:/ K cc: Hon. Gayle Nathan, District Judge

Hutchison & Steffen, LLC

Clark County District Attorney/Falnily Support Division Eighth District Court Clerk

1 Appellant’s failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee could constitute an independent basis on which to dismiss this appeal. w -2<`)202

CLER PRE ECOURT ov l

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.