Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Poelmans v. Kerseboom

Poelmans v. Kerseboom
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 10, 2013

Poelmans v. Kerseboom

Opinion

p An unpub|isheld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

SuPREME Coum‘ OF NEvAoA CLERK’S ORDER (O)-l947 ~'@ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHIEL POELMANS, No. 63426 Appellant, BARBARA KERsEBooM AND oLARK ooUNTY DEPARTMENT oF FAMILY ]UL m mg sERvIcEs, * o o.

R€Spondents_ TRAC\E K. L\NDEMAN D‘EPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed in this court on June 20, 2013, without payment of the requisite filing fee.l On July 8, 2013, appellant filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal dislnissed. lt is so ORDERED.

CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY:/ K cc: Hon. Gayle Nathan, District Judge Hutchison & Steffen, LLC Clark County District Attorney/Falnily Support Division Eighth District Court Clerk Appellant’s failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee could constitute an independent basis on which to dismiss this appeal. w -2<`)202 CLER PRE ECOURT ov l

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.