Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Ojeda-Enriquez (Miguel) v. State

Ojeda-Enriquez (Miguel) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 22, 2013
Ojeda-Enriquez (Miguel) v. State

Opinion

sentences considering the nature of the offenses, duration of the crimes over a 13-month period, age of the victim, and the paternal-type relationship that existed between Ojeda-Enriquez and the victim. While NRS 176.035(1) provides that a concurrent sentence is the default sentence if the court fails to reference a subsequent sentence as either concurrent or consecutive, the statute does not require the district court to articulate the facts that support its decision to impose consecutive sentences and we decline to impose such a requirement. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

,J. Hardesty

Parraguirre V ° Cherry cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge

Washoe County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

4511169CMinin..3301W-131§V0.-9117,MIIVRVAR-5;`,'7''I' .

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.