King (Maurice) v. State

(the decision to issue an advisory instruction lies within the district court's discretion). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

J.

Parraguirre J Cherry cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge

The Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C.

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

'Although we filed the fast track statement and appendix submitted by King, they fail to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. The footnotes in the fast track statement are not in the same size and typeface as the brief and the fact section refers to matters in the record without specific citation to the appendix. Further, the appendix does not contain a single alphabetical index for all documents and the included transcripts are not in chronological order. See NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C), (e)(2)(C); NRAP 30(c)(1)-(2); NRAP 32(a)(5). We caution King's counsel that future failure to comply with the rules of this court may result in the imposition of sanctions. NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) I947A

Eft ;E:s; ' • : • II