Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Eason (Evell) v. State

Eason (Evell) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 22, 2013

Eason (Evell) v. State

Opinion

Eason failed to demonstrate that the district court committed plain error.

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

I- \t4 4 02/1-44. 1 - ,J.

Hardesty

Parraguirre Cherry

cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

"Eason's fast track statement does not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have 1-inch margins on all four sides. We caution Eason's counsel, Ryan Bashor, that future failure to comply with formatting requirements when filing briefs with this court may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.