Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Castro (Ramon) v. State

Castro (Ramon) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 22, 2013

Castro (Ramon) v. State

Opinion

therefore, we conclude that he fails to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Mayfield, Turco & Gruber Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'Although we filed Castro's fast track statement, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief does not contain margins in compliance with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4). Counsel for Castro is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

We deny Castro's request for full briefing and oral argument. See NRAP 3C(k)(1).

r SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A •

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.