Appellant argues that a translation inaccuracy caused counsel to ask the landlord if appellant had paid rent at the landlord's office instead of at the apartment, thereby denying him the opportunity to demonstrate that he had paid rent to the landlord. Even if an inaccuracy occurred, 1 appellant fails to demonstrate that the substance of his statements was fundamentally altered as counsel asked the landlord if appellant came to see him in order to pay rent and the landlord testified that the only one who paid any money for the rent was the victim Having considered appellant's claim and concluded that relief is not warranted, we ORDER the amended judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

Parraguirre

Cherry

1 We note that appellant has not demonstrated a translation inaccuracy as outlined in Ouanbengboune as he failed to submit a translation of his statements to counsel establishing the interpreter's error but merely asserts that there was a misinterpretation.

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Kay Ellen Armstrong Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A