outlined in NRS 125.150(8) in making the award. See Wolff v. Wolff, 112 Nev. 1355, 1359, 929 P.2d 916, 918-19 (1996) (providing that this court will not disturb a district court's disposition of community property or an alimony award absent an abuse of discretion); see also NRS 125.150(8) (providing factors for a district court to consider when awarding spousal support). Finally, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in assigning the tax debts to appellant, as appellant failed to comply with the court's order to provide tax returns demonstrating that the tax debt at issue here was a community debt. See Wolff, 112 Nev. at 1359, 929 P.2d at 918-19. Accordingly, in light of these determinations, and as appellants remaining arguments lack merit, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

, J.

Hardesty

Parraguirre

Cherry

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Nathaniel Tolliver Cassandra Renee Tolliver Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A MENZUM5114011111111111M 7-