Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Scrase v. George's Tire

Scrase v. George's Tire
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 24, 2013
Scrase v. George's Tire

Opinion

genuine issue of material fact remains in dispute and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. To withstand summary judgment, the nonmoving party cannot rely solely on general allegations and conclusions set forth in the pleadings, but must instead present specific facts demonstrating the existence of a genuine factual issue supporting her claims. NRCP 56(e); see also Wood, 121 Nev. at 731, P.3d at 1030-31.

Having reviewed appellant's proper person appeal statement and the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly awarded summary judgment in favor of respondent. Appellant failed to present any specific facts or evidence demonstrating the existence of a genuine issue of material fact supporting her claims against respondent. Id. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

L.P-tuk-A Hardesty

Parraguirre cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge George T. Bochanis, Short Trial Judge Judith Scrase

Valarie I. Fujii & Associates

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A m MES011ta =ME NSt

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.