Carvatta v. Mascolino

circumstances had changed to the extent that a reduction in his alimony obligation was warranted. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

J. Hardesty pc„ Parv.guirre J.

erry cc: Hon. Bill Henderson, District Judge, Family Court Division Michael A. Carvatta

Venesa Mascolino

Eighth District Court Clerk

'To the extent that appellant sought to challenge the district court's May 5, 2010, order under NRCP 60(b) based on inadvertence, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion, as it was untimely. See NRCP 60(b) (providing that motions for relief from judgment based on inadvertence must be filed within six months after service of the notice of entry of the order). Additionally, we have considered appellant's remaining arguments and conclude that they lack merit.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A