Angel v. Eldorado Casino
Angel v. Eldorado Casino
Angel v. Eldorado Casino
Opinion
Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; see also NRAP 21(a)(4) (requiring a petitioner to attach an appendix to his or her petition including a copy of any part of the record before the respondent or any original document necessary for this court to understand the matters set forth in the petition). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
It Hardesty
P CP.4.3t Parraguirre
cc: Randall George Angel McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.