Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Correos v. Wells Fargo Bank

Correos v. Wells Fargo Bank
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 4, 2013
Correos v. Wells Fargo Bank

Opinion

An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. SuPnEME COuRT

OF

NEVADA

CLERK’S ORDER (O)-l 947 @’@

IN TI-IE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

HAROLD CORREOS; AND

ROSEMARIE CORREOS,

P§ppellants, vsi.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; AND

NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING

CO(RPORATION,

Respondents.

N0. 63'719

SEP 04 2013

TRA<:!E K._L:NDEMAN , ¢LER PRE oum' v .

DEPUTY CLERK

ORD:ER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a proper person appeal, docketed in this court on August 2, 2013, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. Further, the notice advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellants have neither paid the filing fee nor responded to this court_’s notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is hereby dismissed. lt is so ORDERED. cc: Hon. Allan R. Earl, District Judge

Harold Correos

Rosemarie Correos

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk

CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

BY: ;H|l( ]`¢A l !Ml§[§|`;; lb - £Gl£l

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.