An unpub|ishdld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

SuPREME CouRT oF NEvAoA

(0) 1947A W~.,.»

IN THE SUPREl\/IE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CARLos MIGUEL CHACoN, N@. 63331 Appellant, VS. THE sTATE oF NEVADA, F l L § Respondent. -

SEP l 7 2013

iE K. LIN‘DEMAN F C U

ORDE'R DISMISSING APPE'AL

This is an appeal from an order of the district court “Denying Defendant’s `Pro Per l\/[otion to Appoint Counsel on Direct Appeal,” and "Denying Defendant’s Pro Per Accused l\/Iotion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject l\/latter Jurisdiction." Eighth Judicial District $Court, Clark County; Stefany l\/Iiley, Judge.

We lack jurisdiction because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from the aforementioned order, C'astillo z). State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990), therefore we

Douglas l

Saitta

cc: Hon. Stefany l\/liley, District Judge

Carlos l\/Iiguel Chacon

Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

lz~zi#lc@/