Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Richard (Antonio) v. Warden

Richard (Antonio) v. Warden
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 18, 2013

Richard (Antonio) v. Warden

Opinion

An unpub|ishéld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

SuPnEME CouRT ` oF NEvAoA (O) l947A ‘

IN THE SUPREl\/IE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ANTONIO RICHARD, No. 63587 Petitioner, vs. DWIGHT NEVEN, WARDEN, F L E D Respondent. SEp 1 8 2013 ¢LEY Séf,z'§).»‘~é"z°§‘”é`c'§um ny DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus.

Petitioner asks this court to direct the district court to consider his second post-conviction petition for_ a writ of habeas corpus on the merits and excuse any procedural bar. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.1’70. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENI éibbons Douglas Saitta cc: Antonio Richard Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.