Lopez (Israel) v. State

laches, appellant failed to demonstrate that his plea was invalid. See State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1105, 13 P.3d 442, 448 (2000); Bryant v. State, 102 Nev. 268, 271, 721 P.2d 364, 367 (1986). Appellant was informed of the possibility of restitution in the written plea agreement, and he affirmed during the plea canvass that he had read and understood the plea agreement. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.

Appellant also claimed that the amount of restitution was incorrect and that the restitution was imposed in an improper manner. To the extent that appellant sought to correct his sentence on this basis, he failed to demonstrate that his sentence was facially illegal. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.

Having concluded that appellant is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

Douglas

J. Saitta cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge

Israel Lopez

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

SUPREME COURT Eighth District Court Clerk

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

YIVEME T-MtlISSEMINEMONSIMINIIMIENHEREM -'