Julian (Quincy) v. State

court's factual findings regarding good cause, but we will review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo."), cert. denied, 568 U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 988 (2013). Furthermore, Julian failed to demonstrate that side effects of the psychotropic drugs should excuse the entire delay. See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003) (holding that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may excuse a procedural default, but the claim itself must not be procedurally defaulted but must be raised within a reasonable time after discovering it to satisfy good cause). We conclude that the district court did not err in rejecting this good-cause argument and in denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Douglas

J. Saitta cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge

Story Law Group

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk