Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Holley (Nicholas) v. State

Holley (Nicholas) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 18, 2013

Holley (Nicholas) v. State

Opinion

See NRS 176A.100(1)(c). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

A- J.

Douglas Le

Saitta

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Humboldt County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk

1-The fast track statement and response fail to comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because they do not contain 1-inch margins on all four sides. Counsel for the parties are cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 44M).

1-1,11-77-}T•Xl: -1( MEM

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.