Harvey (Michael) v. State
Opinion
explained the timeframe for filing the notice of appeal. Harvey indicated his understanding. The district court then stated, "Okay. Then you may be a candidate for alternative sentencing but. . . I would strongly urge you to get mental health treatment." Contrary to Harvey's assertion, the district court did not require him to file an appeal before becoming eligible for alternative sentencing. A fair reading of the record indicates that the district court was merely referring to the house arrest program she mentioned earlier. Further, we note that Harvey did not seek an alternative sentence such as mental health court. We therefore conclude that Harvey fails to demonstrate an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we ORDER the corrected judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
A1 i Douglas
Saitta cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge
Washoe County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Washoe County District Attorney
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.