Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Dehart (Tony) v. State

Dehart (Tony) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 18, 2013
Dehart (Tony) v. State

Opinion

fails to allege or demonstrate any prejudice resulting from the untimely filing and we conclude that no relief is warranted. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of FIRMED.'

Gibbons

4) 3 , J Douglas cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge

Humboldt County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Humboldt County District Attorney

Humboldt County Clerk

'Although we filed Dehart's fast track statement, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure because it is not double- spaced. See NRAP 3C(h)(1); NRAP 32(a)(4). We caution counsel, Matt Stermitz, that future failure to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

WA, • MIKEE!MINI

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.