Haugabook v. Dist. Ct. (Haugabook)

Petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that our extraordinary intervention is warranted, and an appeal is typically considered an adequate legal remedy that precludes writ relief. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered the petition, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. See NRAP 21(b); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851 (stating that the issuance of an extraordinary writ is purely discretionary with this court). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Gibbons

J.

J. Saitta cc: Hon. Jennifer Elliott, District Judge, Family Court Division Anthony Haugabook

Lisa Anne Haugabook

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A