and even assuming that trial counsel's failure to inform him about post- conviction remedies was a legally valid excuse, appellant failed to demonstrate that the entire length of his delay was reasonable. See generally id. at 254-55, 71 P.3d at 507-08. Appellant's claim that he lacked direct access to the law library fell far short of demonstrating that official interference prevented him from filing a timely petition. See id. at 252, 71 P.3d at 506. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the petition as procedurally time barred. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment district court AFFIRMED. f th oA .,

Gibbons

Douglas •

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Curtis Billy Bonilla Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk