Tooski v. Trujillo

making an adequate appellate record" and "[w]hen an appellant fails to include necessary documentation in the record, we necessarily presume that the missing portion supports the district court's decision"). Further, without any document in the record showing what, if any, pretrial disclosures were made by appellant, we cannot determine whether appellant's initial NRCP 16.1(a)(1) disclosure sufficiently disclosed all of the witnesses and exhibits appellant intended to use. Therefore, we must presume that the record would support the district court's finding that appellant's NRCP 16.1(a)(1) disclosures were insufficient. Cuzze, 123 Nev. at 603, 172 P.3d at 135. As a result, we affirm the district court's order excluding appellant's exhibits and witnesses and ultimately dismissing appellant's complaint. Id.; NRCP 16.1(g); NRCP 16.1(e)(3).

It is so ORDERED.

,J Gibbons ue-PiI ,

Dou

Saitta cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge

Ehsan Tooski

Prestige Law Group

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A