Mackie v. Dist. Ct. (La Pelusa)

will not issue when the petitioners have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law, NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330, and we have consistently held that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Specifically, petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from any adverse final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Saitta cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge

Hansen Rasmussen, LLC

Cottle Law Firm

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A