Gillen v. Dist. Ct. (Grierson)
Opinion
Having considered the parties' arguments and the supporting documents presented to this court, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is not warranted, see Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851, and petitioner's underlying action shall therefore proceed forward in the Fifth Judicial District Court, where it is currently docketed. To the extent that the order transferring petitioner's case to the Eighth Judicial District Court has not been vacated, however, petitioner should take appropriate action in the Fifth Judicial District Court to ensure that the transfer order is set aside. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'
Gibbons
J.
Saitta
"The clerk of this court shall file petitioner's July 9, 2013, motion, his August 6, 2013, correction of address, and his August 20, 2013, reply. In light of this order, we deny all further requests for relief pending in this matter.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A cc: Raymond Gillen
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Eighth District Court Clerk
Nye County Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.