Polk v. Dist. Ct. (State)

107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). It is within our discretion to determine if a writ petition will be considered. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered both the petition and the amended petition,' we conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Thus, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. It is so ORDERED.

iLt Hardesty

Parraguirre

Cherry cc: Renard Truman Polk

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk

Pershing County Clerk

'We direct the clerk of this court to file the amended petition, provisionally received in this court on August 1, 2013.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A