Luther v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Nevada Supreme Court

Luther v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Opinion

An unpub|ishltd order sha|lnot be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

SuPREME CouRT oF NEvAnA

<o> 1947A 1 =~

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOHN LUTHER,

Appellant,

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; AND §“" H ® MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE

LENDING, INC., (Subprime), gm 0 q 2013

No. 60544

Respondents. cu;lzR ev

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

On September 30, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to dismiss this appeal. The stipulation does not specifically indicate whether appellant is seeking to dismiss this appeal with respect to respondent Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending.ib Nonetheless, because Merrill Lynch is represented by the same counsel as Wells Fargo, we construe the stipulation as an agreement to dismiss this appeal in its entirety. Having considered the stipulation, we approve it and hereby dismiss this appeal. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(};)).

lt is so ORDERED.

9

QWMW-P , c.J. j

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Mark L. Mausert Tiffany & Bosco, P. A. Washoe District Court Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished