Luther v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Luther v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
An unpub|ishltd order sha|lnot be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
SuPREME CouRT oF NEvAnA
<o> 1947A 1 =~
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOHN LUTHER,
Appellant,
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; AND §“" H ® MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE
LENDING, INC., (Subprime), gm 0 q 2013
No. 60544
Respondents. cu;lzR ev
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On September 30, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to dismiss this appeal. The stipulation does not specifically indicate whether appellant is seeking to dismiss this appeal with respect to respondent Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending.ib Nonetheless, because Merrill Lynch is represented by the same counsel as Wells Fargo, we construe the stipulation as an agreement to dismiss this appeal in its entirety. Having considered the stipulation, we approve it and hereby dismiss this appeal. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(};)).
lt is so ORDERED.
9
QWMW-P , c.J. j
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Mark L. Mausert Tiffany & Bosco, P. A. Washoe District Court Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished