Viega Gmbh v. Dist. Ct. (La Paloma Homeowner's Assoc.)

Nevada Supreme Court

Viega Gmbh v. Dist. Ct. (La Paloma Homeowner's Assoc.)

Opinion

An unpub|ishl|»d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

SuPREME Coun'r oF NEvAnA

(0) 1947A ...=\z:;'§~_{¢_`:‘{`;'i':l<»

VIEGA GMBH; AND VIEGA INTERNATIONAL GMBH, Petitioners,

vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 'COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE SUSAN JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents,

and

LA PALOMA HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION,

Real Party in Interest.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 60015

F§L

OCT l 'l 2013

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

Petitioners have filed a motion to withdraw their petition for a

writ of prohibition, stating that pursuant to a settlement, real party in

interest has dismissed petitioners as defendants in the district court

action.

Having considered petitioners’ motion to withdraw their writ

petition, we grant the motion. Accordingly, we

CCI

ORDER the petition DISMISSED.

, C.J.

Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Lincoln, Gustafson & Cercos Fennemore Craig, P.C./Phoenix Fennemore Craig J ones Vargas/Las Vegas Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, LLP Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP Carraway & Associates

Robert C. Maddox & Associates/Reno Lynch, Hopper & Salzano, LLP Canepa Riedy & Rubino

Eighth District Court Clerk

|3 ~?oclo?

Reference

Status
Unpublished