Viega Gmbh v. Dist. Ct. (La Paloma Homeowner's Assoc.)
Viega Gmbh v. Dist. Ct. (La Paloma Homeowner's Assoc.)
Opinion
An unpub|ishl|»d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
SuPREME Coun'r oF NEvAnA (0) 1947A ...=\z:;'§~_{¢_`:‘{`;'i':l<»
VIEGA GMBH; AND VIEGA INTERNATIONAL GMBH, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 'COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE SUSAN JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and LA PALOMA HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, Real Party in Interest.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA No. 60015
F§L OCT l 'l 2013
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION Petitioners have filed a motion to withdraw their petition for a writ of prohibition, stating that pursuant to a settlement, real party in interest has dismissed petitioners as defendants in the district court action.
Having considered petitioners’ motion to withdraw their writ petition, we grant the motion. Accordingly, we CCI ORDER the petition DISMISSED. , C.J.
Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Lincoln, Gustafson & Cercos Fennemore Craig, P.C./Phoenix Fennemore Craig J ones Vargas/Las Vegas Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, LLP Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP Carraway & Associates Robert C. Maddox & Associates/Reno Lynch, Hopper & Salzano, LLP Canepa Riedy & Rubino Eighth District Court Clerk |3 ~?oclo?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.