Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Treadwell (Gustavious) v. State

Treadwell (Gustavious) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided October 16, 2013
Treadwell (Gustavious) v. State

Opinion

that it constituted a breach of the plea agreement, and we conclude that he fails to demonstrate plain error. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 134-35 (2009); Mendoza-Lobos v. State, 125 Nev. 634, 644, 218 P.3d 501, 507 (2009); Sullivan v. State, 115 Nev. 383, 388 n.4, 390 n.7, 990 P.2d 1258, 1261 n.4, 1262 n.7 (1999). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 2

J.

Parraguirre ‘41 Cherry cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge

Jonathan L. Powell

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

2 Although we filed the submitted fast track statement, fast track appendix, and fast track response, they do not comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. The fast track statement does not contain margins of at least 1 inch on all four sides, see NRAP 3C(h)(1); NRAP 32(a)(4), the fast track appendix does not contain all required documents, see NRAP 3C(e)(2)(C); NRAP 30(b)(2)-(3), and the fast track response is not double-spaced, see NRAP 3C(h)(1); NRAP 32(a)(4). We caution the parties that future failure to comply with all applicable rules may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.