petition would have been dismissed regardless of his response as it was time-barred pursuant to NRS 34.726, which requires such a habeas corpus petition to be filed within one year of the entry of the judgment of conviction. See Lewis, 518 U.S. at 356 (providing that in order to establish a claim for lack of access to the courts, one must demonstrate that he or she was prevented from pursuing a nonfrivolous claim); see also Alvarez v. Hill, 518 F.3d 1152, 1155 n.1 (9th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

J.

pd esty

#4164.0k Parraguirre

J.

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Matthew James King Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

"Having considered appellant's other arguments, we conclude that they lack merit.

2