Brock (Shawn) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Brock (Shawn) v. State

Opinion

that the punishment imposed is disproportionate to the crime, see Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion), and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

Hardesty

b.4 jit Parraguirre

aktit Cherry

cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

"The fast track response submitted by the State does not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because the text is not double- spaced. Counsel for the State is cautioned that the failure to comply with the formatting requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished