Brock (Shawn) v. State

that the punishment imposed is disproportionate to the crime, see Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion), and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

Hardesty b.4 jit

Parraguirre aktit

Cherry cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge

Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

"The fast track response submitted by the State does not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because the text is not double- spaced. Counsel for the State is cautioned that the failure to comply with the formatting requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).