Bell (Cordale) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Bell (Cordale) v. State

Opinion

supplemental petition without an evidentiary hearing, see Nika v. State, 124 Nev. 1272, 1300-01, 198 P.3d 839, 858 (2008) (explaining that a petitioner's habeas claims must consist of more than bare allegations, and he is only entitled to an evidentiary hearing if he has asserted specific factual allegations that are not belied or repelled by the record and that, if true, would entitle him to relief). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/ ,J. Hardesty

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge The Digesti Law Firm, Ltd. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

Reference

Status
Unpublished