Bell (Cordale) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
Bell (Cordale) v. State
Opinion
supplemental petition without an evidentiary hearing, see Nika v. State, 124 Nev. 1272, 1300-01, 198 P.3d 839, 858 (2008) (explaining that a petitioner's habeas claims must consist of more than bare allegations, and he is only entitled to an evidentiary hearing if he has asserted specific factual allegations that are not belied or repelled by the record and that, if true, would entitle him to relief). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
/ ,J. Hardesty
cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge The Digesti Law Firm, Ltd. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished