Sexton v. Wells Fargo Bank
Nevada Supreme Court
Sexton v. Wells Fargo Bank
Opinion
Having considered the parties' arguments, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, because the summary judgment was an interlocutory order adjudicating liability only, and did not award or otherwise resolve the claim for damages. NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment as one that resolves all of the rights and liabilities of all the parties). Accordingly, we grant the motion and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Wm. Patterson Cashill, Settlement Judge Gunderson Law Firm McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished