Sexton v. Wells Fargo Bank

Nevada Supreme Court

Sexton v. Wells Fargo Bank

Opinion

Having considered the parties' arguments, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, because the summary judgment was an interlocutory order adjudicating liability only, and did not award or otherwise resolve the claim for damages. NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment as one that resolves all of the rights and liabilities of all the parties). Accordingly, we grant the motion and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Wm. Patterson Cashill, Settlement Judge Gunderson Law Firm McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

Reference

Status
Unpublished