Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Russell v. Pappas

Russell v. Pappas
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided August 1, 2014
Russell v. Pappas

Opinion

An unpub|islled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. IN THE SUPREME C()URT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RUSSELL, No. 65880

Appellant_,

Fll.§ ;

CHRISTINE PAPPAS_,

Respondent. AUG g 1 2[]]!¢

T Cl .L!NUE|‘AAN

F PREM COURT

DEPUTV CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying his request to amend a district courtsorder granting him in forma pauperis status. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Tczylor C'onsz‘.r. C'o. i). Hilton Hotels C'orp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Accordiiigly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. pettway @J_

Pickei’in g j rises

0~4.)1 ,J_ = »/1 ,L __ ,J.

Parraguirre s Saitta _1._ cc; Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge

Russell

Demetras & O’Neill

Washoe District Court Clerk

Sur»nems Courrr or

NEvAoA "°’ o /i » 2 iam

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.