Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Doyle v. Hartnell

Doyle v. Hartnell
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 28, 2014

Doyle v. Hartnell

Opinion

An unpub|ish SuPnEMs Coum OF NEVADA CLEFIK’S ORDER fOl~l947 -1®» ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CURTIS L. DoYLE, No. @5030 Appellant, vs. SHANI)A MARIE HARTNELL, F E E“ E R@SP°“‘*@“** JuL 2a 2014 CLE‘§I§ACIE “¥ DEl*l.lTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed in this court on February 25, 2014, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal 'l`o date, appellant has not,paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s notice Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. lt is so OR.DER.ED. CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY: L&[]lg‘g l !MNI£ cc: Hon. Gayle Nathan, District Judge Curtis L. Doyle Shanda l\/larie Hartnell Eighth District Court Clerk /4~~245.2!.,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.