Aggregate Indus.-Swr, Inc. v. Caid Indus., Inc.
Aggregate Indus.-Swr, Inc. v. Caid Indus., Inc.
Opinion
An unpub|isliied order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREl\/[E COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES-S\)VR, INC. N@. 65039 F/K/A soUTHERN NEVADA PAVING, Q:I)c;é,ll¢:ril\ti:\/ADA coRPoRATioN, 4 § 5 L E D i/:Si-'\ID INDUSTRIES, iNC., AN TJU'L EL?N:::'N §:%SII.)Z£§; oRPoRATioN, ;LER§F DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed in this court on February 2’7, 2014, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. lt is so ORDERED.
CLERK or THE SUPREME CoUR'r TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY: cc: Hon. l\/[ark R. Denton, District Judge Peel Brirnley LLP/Henderson Pezzillo Lloyd Eighth District Court Clerk SL\FREME count or Ni=_vAoA CLEFIK’S OHDER <m-wu §§ /4'_
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.