Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Brodsky v. Roux (Child Custody)

Brodsky v. Roux (Child Custody)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 28, 2014
Brodsky v. Roux (Child Custody)

Opinion

An unpub|isliled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOSHUA BRODSKY, N@. 65140

Appellant,

Vs.

ELIZABETH JEAN RoUX, F l L E

R@SP°“°*@“"~ ' lui 2a 2014

TRACl K. L|NDEMAN

CLE F R COURT

CY osPurv clean

ORDER DISZl/IISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed in this court on l\/[arch 5, 2014, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directingappellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal 'l`o date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, cause appearing this appeal is dismissed. lt is so ORDERED.

CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

BY: l/. cc: Hon. Bryce C. Duckworth, District Judge, Family Court Division Joshua Brodsky

Pecos Law Group

Eighth District Court Clerk

SuPREMe count

01=

NEvAl:)A

CLEFIK'S OF|DEF| col-1047 am

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.