Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Brodsky v. Roux (Child Custody)

Brodsky v. Roux (Child Custody)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 28, 2014

Brodsky v. Roux (Child Custody)

Opinion

An unpub|isliled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOSHUA BRODSKY, N@. 65140 Appellant, Vs. ELIZABETH JEAN RoUX, F l L E R@SP°“°*@“"~ ' lui 2a 2014 TRACl K. L|NDEMAN CLE F R COURT CY osPurv clean ORDER DISZl/IISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed in this court on l\/[arch 5, 2014, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directingappellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal 'l`o date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, cause appearing this appeal is dismissed. lt is so ORDERED.

CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY: l/. cc: Hon. Bryce C. Duckworth, District Judge, Family Court Division Joshua Brodsky Pecos Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk SuPREMe count 01= NEvAl:)A CLEFIK'S OF|DEF| col-1047 am

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.