Brodsky v. Roux (Child Custody)
Opinion
An unpub|isliled order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSHUA BRODSKY, N@. 65140
Appellant,
Vs.
ELIZABETH JEAN RoUX, F l L E
R@SP°“°*@“"~ ' lui 2a 2014
TRACl K. L|NDEMAN
CLE F R COURT
CY osPurv clean
ORDER DISZl/IISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed in this court on l\/[arch 5, 2014, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directingappellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal 'l`o date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, cause appearing this appeal is dismissed. lt is so ORDERED.
CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
BY: l/. cc: Hon. Bryce C. Duckworth, District Judge, Family Court Division Joshua Brodsky
Pecos Law Group
Eighth District Court Clerk
SuPREMe count
01=
NEvAl:)A
CLEFIK'S OF|DEF| col-1047 am
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.