Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Acosta v. D'Acosta C/W 63720

Acosta v. D'Acosta C/W 63720
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 28, 2014

Acosta v. D'Acosta C/W 63720

Opinion

An unpub|is|]ied order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

SuvREME Counr DF NEvAc>A <oy 1947/a RAFAEL ACOSTA, Appellant, vs. YOLY D’ACOSTA, Respondent.

R.AFAEL ACOSTA, Appellant, vs. YOLY I)’ACOSTA, Respondent.

No. 62543 No. 63 720 ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS conclude that these appeals have been abandoned, and we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.

IN THE SUPREl\/IE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TR C| K. L|NDEM»¢ N RE C$URT n ¢L./ On May 27, 2014, this court issued an order allowing appellant’s counsel to withdrawand giving appellant 15 days to either retain new counsel and cause counsel to.enter an appearance, or to file a notice that he intends to pursue these consolidated appeals in proper person. Our May 27 order cautioned appellant that failure to respond would result in these appeals being dismissed as abandoned To date, appellant has failed to respond to our order in any way. Accordingly, we FLEB JUL' 28 Zlllll DEPUTY CLERK CM»» . A.C.J. cc: Hon. Robert ’I.‘euton_, District Judge, Family Court Division Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge Rafael Acosta Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk /4-24.5!8

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.