Watkins v. Erickson
Watkins v. Erickson
Opinion
An unpub|isliizd order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STA'I`E OF NEVADA
JONATHAN WATKINS, NO. 65'720 Appellant, vs. PATRICIA lVl. ERICKSON, F a L E Resp°nde“t' JuL 2a 2014 TRACIE K. L|NDEMAN RT l DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a proper person appeal docketed in this court on l\/lay 21, 2014, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the filing fee within rten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within the ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal To date, ppellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly_, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.l It is so ORDERED.
CLERK 0F THE SUPREME CoURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY: cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Jonathan Edward Watkins Travis E. Shetler Eighth District Court Clerk In light of this order, respondent’s motion requesting the court to dismiss this appeal is denied as moot. supreme Counr oF NevAnA CLERK’S ORDEH (¢1>-\947 mm /4 -£45£0
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.