Nevada Supreme Court, 2014

Yocum (Christopher) v. State

Yocum (Christopher) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 22, 2014

Yocum (Christopher) v. State

Opinion

Yocum has not alleged that the district court relied solely on impalpable or highly suspect evidence or that the sentencing statute is unconstitutional, see Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 347-48, 213 P.3d 476, 489-90 (2009), and fails to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1

J.

Pickering

cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge Calvert & Hubach, LLC Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

'Although we filed the fast track statement submitted by Yocum, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure because it is not entirely double-spaced, see NRAP 32(a)(4), and the statement of facts section refers to matters in the record without specific citation to the appendix, see NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C). Counsel for Yocum is cautioned that the failure to comply with this court's briefing requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (C) 1.947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.