Petitioner has failed to include the challenged order of the district court. NRAP 21(a)(4). Without that basis, the writ petition does not show that the law clearly compels a writ in petitioner's favor, and petitioner has not shown that relief is warranted. Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Thus, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. NRAP 21(b); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

,Laads.„ Hardesty

, J.

Douglas

Ch$24 Cherry

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Law Offices of Kenneth E. Goates Law Office of William R. Brenske Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A e