Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioner has not shown that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 •P.3d at 844; Smith, Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; see also Walden v. Fiore, 517 U.S. , , 134 S. Ct. 1115, 1122 (2014) (holding that jurisdiction was not proper in Nevada where the defendant's only contact with Nevada was his contact with plaintiffs who were Nevada citizens, because the plaintiff cannot be the only link between the defendant and the forum state as it is "the defendant's conduct that must form the necessary connection with the forum State that is the basis for its jurisdiction over him"). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pickering 14)9 task

Parra

J.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP/Las Vegas Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, PC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 19474 e