Johnson (Michael) v. State
Johnson (Michael) v. State
Johnson (Michael) v. State
Opinion
recommended by the Division of Parole and Probation, we conclude that his claim is without merit because a district court does not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence in excess of that suggested by the Division. See Collins v. State, 88 Nev. 168, 171, 494 P.2d 956, 957 (1972).
Having concluded that Johnson is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
et Asktik_ 9, J.
Parraguirre Saitta
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Nguyen & Lay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.