Johnson (Michael) v. State

recommended by the Division of Parole and Probation, we conclude that his claim is without merit because a district court does not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence in excess of that suggested by the Division. See Collins v. State, 88 Nev. 168, 171, 494 P.2d 956, 957 (1972). Having concluded that Johnson is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

et Asktik_ 9, J. Parraguirre Saitta cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge

Nguyen & Lay

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A e