not under a sentence of death or imprisonment as required by NRS 34.724.

See Coleman v. State, 130 Nev. „ 321 P.3d 863, 867 (2014).

Therefore, because Joiner did not meet the imprisonment requirement of NRS 34.724, he was not eligible for post-conviction habeas relief. See id. For this reason, we affirm the decision of the district court to deny the petition. 2 Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3

Parraguirre ao-c J.

Saitta

2Although the district court incorrectly addressed the procedural bars and merits of the claims, we nevertheless affirm because the district court reached the correct result in denying the petition. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason).

3 Joiner's counsel has filed two motions for leave to amend or supplement the fast track statement and response with recent relevant authority that supports his claims that his lifetime supervision conditions are unconstitutional. Because we do not reach the merits of Joiner's challenges to his sentence of lifetime supervision, we deny the motions to supplement his fast track statement with authority and argument related to those issues.

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA (0) 1947A e cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Turco & Draskovich Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A