Blanchard (Anthony) v. State

post-conviction habeas relief See id. For this reason, we affirm the decision of the district court to deny the petition. 1 Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

&nth Pickering c--c J. Parraguirre

CoS

Saitta

J.

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge

Turco & Draskovich

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney •

Eighth District Court Clerk

'Although the district court incorrectly addressed the procedural bars and merits of the claims, we nevertheless affirm because the district court reached the correct result in denying the petition. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason).

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A e